• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCP Assessment

  • Home
  • Canvas How-To Slides
  • Canvas How-To Videos
  • Sample Portfolio

Faculty Materials

November 13, 2019 by McKenna Rose

About ePortfolios & WCP Assessment

Every student in every section of ENGL 1101/2 taught at Georgia Tech composes an electronic portfolio and submits the portfolio at the end of the semester. Each portfolio includes a Reflective Essay on the first page, a page showcasing the Common First Week Letter (1101) or Video (1102) and process materials through which students developed the first week common assignment, as well as a series of short, reflective paragraphs through which students narrate their progress through the course. In addition to the Reflective Essay, Common First Week assignment page, and connective reflective writing, students are required to include at least three other pages that showcase final drafts of major artifacts produced in the course along with process materials, that is drafts, pitches, artist statements, scripts, drawings, and peer feedback reports. Because composing in multiple modes is a central aim of the WCP, student portfolios are likely to include final and process documents for podcasts, videos, posters, presentations, board games, artbooks, maps, and much more.

The goal of the ePortfolio project is two fold. The first goal of the project is to integrate the reflection on writing as a process into every stage of ENGL 1101/2 at Georgia Tech, and the ePortfolio is the best measure of how well students meet the WCP outcome on process and reflection. When students reflect on not only what they learned, but also how they learned it, studies show they are more likely to transfer those skills from first year courses to their major subject classes. In other words, the portfolio demonstrates to students and faculty, the ways in which writing is a process that occurs in always changing constraints. Through the composition of the showcase portfolio, we aim for students to meet future writing challenges by drawing on a writing process best suited to the contexts they face.

The second goal of the ePortfolio project is programmatic Assessment.  Brittain Fellows and WCP Lecturers meet in assigned groups of three six times over the academic year to assess how well a randomly generated set of student portfolios shows how well the WCP has met its programmatic outcomes. The portfolios are scored in terms of the WCP Common Feedback Chart, which is embedded below.

 WCP Common Feedback Chart

Filed Under: Faculty Materials

November 13, 2019 by McKenna Rose

Assessment Form & How-To Access URLs

Monthly Assessment Form

Monthly Assessment Dropbox Folder

How-To Access Portfolio URLs
Common Feedback Chart

Common Feedback Chart

Filed Under: Faculty Materials

November 13, 2019 by McKenna Rose

Best Practices & FAQs

Please find the Best Practice and FAQ document below. If you would like to contribute to the FAQs, please email mckenna.rose@lmc.gatech.edu.

How long should I meet with my assessment group?

Each group should meet for 3 hours, allowing one hour per individual portfolio. Spend 10-15 minutes assessing and discussing each page of the portfolio. Each portfolio should have five pages, including a reflective essay, a first-week common video, and three additional artifacts. (Summer portfolios do not include first-week videos). The discussion that leads to scoring consensus with your group is the most important part of the assessment.

What exactly are we assessing?

As you assess, consider:

  • The quality of the artifact itself
  • How well the student describes the context for the artifact
  • How well the student uses process documents as evidence of their writing process
  • How well the student uses the reflection section to discuss the assignment Goals, Purpose, Audience, Design for Medium, and Revision
  • How well the page is organized given the affordances of Canvas

Please do not assess:

  • The software used to compose the ePortfolio
  • The instructor’s assignment

When evaluating modes, are we looking at all the process documents or the final artifact?

The only modes you should consider are in the modes of the artifact itself.

Can I just list the number of process documents used?

No. Please list the type of each process document the student uses.

Are we assessing how the student uses Canvas?

The layout of the artifact page in Canvas should not influence your assessment of the student’s project. Likewise, the project having been submitted using Canvas is not sufficient grounds for an artifact to qualify as being electronic.

How do I judge if a mode is present in a project?

Written

Oral

Visual

Electronic

Non-Verbal

Most Artifacts Podcasts Posters Websites Podcasts
Sound Collections Artbooks Slideshows Poster Session
Vide0 Brochures Video Presentation
Recorded Presentations Board Games Podcasts Board Games
Slideshows Posters/Brochures Survey
Video Protest
Websites
3D Objects

This list above is not exhaustive. Many artifacts have multiple modes. Anything using digital design software, counts as both visual and electronic. Non-Verbal includes gesture, intonation, and volume of the voice.

Why is consensus preferable in the post-discussion ratings of portfolio artifacts?

A post-discussion consensus helps to prepare assessment data for university-facing reports. By discussing your judgments, everyone in the WCP develops a better understanding of the assignment and its rankings.

What should you do if you disagree with your group?

Try to resolve the disagreement. If after five minutes you do not agree, bubble in your score and use the notes field to indicate why you’re committed to a different position. The Assistant Director for Assessment uses this information to prepare the data for reports. Please also note, you do not need to agree exactly, but instead come within one category, higher or lower, as your group.

What should I do if a portfolio is missing an artifact?

In the Google form, select “N/A” across the board in both the pre and post discussion fields because the form requires an answer for each artifact. Please add a note explaining that the student was missing the artifact. This applies if a student is missing an artifact page altogether or if they do not include the final artifact in the page itself.

How do I assess an artifact that is unfamiliar to me (e.g., podcasts, board games, etc.)?

Review the instructor’s assignment sheet in order to understand the goals and purpose of the assignment. Consider how the common rubric applies to the assignment. The Google Monthly Team Assignment sheet provides links for each assignment.

How do I assess an artifact that consists of multiple parts?

Refer to the instructor’s assignment sheet so that you can understand the purpose of the various pieces of the artifact. If a student has included a scaffolding piece of a larger assignment (annotated bibliography, project proposal) that qualifies as a process document. In some cases, a final artifact might consist of two or more parts.

When we are evaluating modes, are we looking at all the process documents or the final artifact?

The final artifact should be used to determine the modes.

I’m doing assessment on a monthly basis. Should I list membership in the Assessment Committee on my CV?

No. While monthly assessment is an important and critical task, the Assessment Committee serves an administrative function that is distinct.

If you have a question or concern that you think the Assessment Committee should add to this document, please contact:

Dr. McKenna Rose

mckenna.rose@lmc.gatech.edu

Assistant Director for Assessment

Marion L. Brittain Postdoctoral Fellow

Assessment Committee Members, 2018-Present

Hannah Markley, Executive Member

George Thomas, Member

Aleksander Sedzielarz, Member

Mary Grace Elliott, Member

John Taylor, Member

McKenna Rose, Chair

Assessment Committee Members and Chairs, 2016-2017 and 2017-2018

Michael Griffin, Member

James Howard, Member

Ian Afflerbach, Member

Dori Coblentz, Member

Russell Kirkscey, Member

Andrea Krafft (2015-16 Co-Chair, 2016-2017 Chair)

Rebekah Greene (2017-2019 Chair)

 

 

 

Filed Under: Faculty Materials

November 13, 2019 by McKenna Rose

Portfolio Upload Instructions

Please find instructions for submitting Student Portfolios to Dropbox. Please note: we are no longer using the LMC Shares Drive and you do no longer need to login through the remote VPN to submit portfolios.

Preparing Portfolio Files for Submission (Mac)

Once all of your students have submitted a URL for their portfolios using the Assignments function in Canvas, complete the following to prepare the portfolio files for submission to the dropbox folder:

Preparing Portfolio Files for Submission (PC)

Filed Under: Faculty Materials

November 13, 2019 by McKenna Rose

Responding to Student Work

Grading Multimodal Projects

Building Rubrics in Canvas

 

Filed Under: Faculty Materials

Primary Sidebar

WOVENText

Portfolio Instructions 1101

Portfolio Instructions 1102

Remote Instruction Modules

  • Portfolio Basics
  • Written Design
  • Oral Design
  • Visual Design
  • Electronic Design
  • Nonverbal Design
  • Reflective Essay

Footer

Contact Information

Writing and Communication Program

215 Bobby Dodd Way N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30332

School of Literature, Media, and Communication

Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts

WCP Assessment Committee Members, 2020-2021

McKenna Rose, Chair

Hannah Markley, Executive Member

George Thomas 

Julia Tigner 

Aleksander Sedzielarz 

Mary Grace Elliott

Help Docs

  • Antiracist SLO Project
  • Canvas How-To Slides
  • Canvas How-To Videos
  • Faculty Materials
  • Home
  • Instruction Modules
  • Uncategorized

Copyright © 2025 · Executive Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in